Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster Dana Thomas
Publisher: Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated

"The idea, luxury executives explained, was to "democratize" luxury, to make luxury "accessible". So it should read: Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster (not It's like is mentioned in the blog a few sentences down). Its is a possessive pronoun meaning, more or less, of it or belonging to it. Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster. I just finished reading Dana Thomas' Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster (highly recommended)now I want to go back and re-read BHTB from an entirely new perspective. €Deluxe : How Luxury Lost Its Luster” de Dana Thomas Offert par une amie (thanks Anne for this amazing book) lors de mon séjour NYC. Deluxe.How.Luxury.Lost.Its.Luster.pdf. When Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster first came out in 2007, I remember reading book reviews that placed reviewers in the extremes of love and hate. Photo cover courtesy of Amazon.com. Over the past decade it seems as though luxury has devolved from class to mass to crass. For people who are interested in behind-the-scenes look at the luxury fashion industry today, you can check out Deluxe: How luxury lost its luster by Dana Thomas. It's a must-read for anyone who has ever gasped at the extortionate prices of designer goods, luxury items, handbags no less. Matter of Reading: Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster. Duluxe by Dana Thomas is a must read. It's is a contraction for it is or it has. So in keeping with this point of view I decided to read a book about the fashion industry; Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster. Heck, it sounded almost communist." But it wasn't.